The Line in the Sand

What lines are we drawing in the sand as we engage with people?

by

Gerald A. Klingbeil

We are faced with many lines in the sand these days. Everyone seems to be digging in to fiercely defend their line in the sand. As we face a seemingly unending pandemic, heated discussions about social distancing, face masks, freedom of speech, racism, theology, or politics rage online, intruding on all our relationships and underlining an ever-increasing sense of polarization.

To “draw a line in the sand” goes back, in one reference, to an encounter between the Roman consul Gaius Popillius Laenas and the Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who, in 168 B.C., was about to enter the Ptolemaic city of Alexandria with a large army. Based on the report of the Roman historian Livy,* the Roman leader drew a circle around Antiochus, handed him the written demands by the Roman Senate ordering an immediate retreat, and told him not to move out of the circle until he had considered the consequences. Antiochus hesitated briefly as he contemplated his options. He then agreed to withdraw with his army. Rome had just exerted its power and influence—even in the absence of its battle-hardened legions—by drawing a line in the sand.

What lines are we drawing in the sand as we engage with people living in a complex world?

What lines are we drawing in the sand as we engage with people living in a complex world? What issues are nonnegotiable for followers of Jesus waiting for the coming of the Master?

When we face tough choices and difficult circumstances, it’s always good to consider the example of Jesus. Jesus faced a polarized nation. First-century Judaism was awash in competing sects and parties. His starting point, while talking to a top-notch religious scholar and member of the Sanhedrin, was this: “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again” (John 3:3). The kingdom of God requires a complete reset, a spiritual birth, resulting in a new direction, even if it’s only in baby steps, toward the heavenly Father.

Once our operating system has been changed, we still face hard questions that require us to make difficult choices. How did Jesus make these calls as those surrounding Him sought to push and pull and drag Him into their arguments and agendas?

Gentle Jesus chose His battles carefully. His opponents goaded and prodded Him—yet He remained kind and caring and focused on God’s kingdom. Kingdom values, however, were never up for discussion as Jesus engaged His world. Jesus ignored the legalistic Sabbath interpretations of His contemporaries as they sought to trap Him and His disciples. He never engaged in the typical rabbinical Sabbath discussions, yet He never wavered on the Sabbath that He had established right at Creation. That was a line in the sand.

In the midst of an increasingly more toxic mix of vibes and opinions produced on social media by those who feel strongly about what’s right and what’s wrong, let’s resist the temptation to retaliate and respond in kind. Before we draw another line in the sand, let’s make sure that this line is based on kingdom values and reflects the mind and heart of Jesus.

* For the text, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaius_Popillius_Laenas.

Gerald A. Klingbeil serves as an associate editor of Adventist Review Ministries.

Comment

About the Author

Gerald A. Klingbeil, D.Litt., has served the Adventist Church for more than three decades internationally as a professor and editor. He now lives with his wife, Chantal, close to the beautiful city of Hamburg, Germany, where he serves as CFO of the Hanseatic Conference of Seventh-day Adventists.

Sign up for the newsletter

Get the latest Adventist news straight into your inbox.

Related

Featured article image
Columns

How, When, and Who?

The mission defines the moment. The message defines the movement. And the church defines the witness.

Erton C. Köhler

October 18, 2026

Featured article image
Columns

Words Really Do Matter

This proposed constitutional change could pave the way not only for doctrinal deviation but for congregationalism, a form of governance every bit as harmful to global unity as papalism.

Shane Anderson

October 16, 2026

Featured article image
Columns

The Two-Party Trap

Both political parties represent basic ideologies and worldviews we must oppose.

Dwight K. Nelson

October 12, 2026

Featured article image
Columns

Trapped by Logic

Some of my good friends stay in the church, and though I’m glad they’re here, I don’t understand why.

Clifford Goldstein

October 9, 2026

Comments

Leave a comment

We'll send a link to confirm it's you. New here? Your account is created when you confirm. Your address is never published.

Advertisement

ADRA - Be the hands and feet of Jesus so all may live as God intended.